People v. Coleman

254 A.D.2d 224, 679 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11347
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 A.D.2d 473

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.), rendered March 28, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury’s credibility determinations and we find that the jury accorded appropriate weight to the credible evidence.

Since defendant did not fulfill his obligation to create an adequate record for appellate review, his current claim that he was denied his right to be present at bench conferences during the jury voir dire is unreviewable (People v Maher, 89 NY2d 318, 325). In any event, the existing record does not show that defendant was excluded from any conferences at which he could have made a meaningful contribution (supra).

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur— Lemer, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Coleman, 254 A.D.2d 224, 679 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 224 (People v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maher
675 N.E.2d 833 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)