People v. Coleman

253 A.D.2d 827, 677 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9554
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 219 A.D.2d 827

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered May 14, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to disprove the defendant’s claim that he acted as agent of an undercover police officer while purchasing and selling narcotics (see, People v Herring, 83 NY2d 780). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Coleman, 253 A.D.2d 827, 677 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

253 A.D.2d 827 (People v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Herring
632 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)