People v. Coleman

225 A.D.2d 705, 639 N.Y.2d 939, 639 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2593
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1996·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s contention that the People failed to disprove his albi defense beyond a reasonable doubt is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, the defendant’s contention is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). The jury was not bound to accept the testimony of the defendant’s alibi witnesses (see, People v Vasquez, 160 AD2d 969, 970).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions [706] and find them to be without merit. Miller, J. P., Hart, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Coleman, 225 A.D.2d 705, 639 N.Y.2d 939, 639 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

225 A.D.2d 705 (People v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martinez
292 A.D.2d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Ruiz
291 A.D.2d 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Coleman
286 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Coleman v. New York City Police Department
282 A.D.2d 390 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Wells
272 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Marinus
254 A.D.2d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)