People v. Marinus

254 A.D.2d 372, 678 N.Y.S.2d 532
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 13, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered May 15, 1996, convicting him of assault in the second degree and attempted grand larceny in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s contention that the People failed to disprove his alibi defense beyond a reasonable doubt is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Santos, 86 [373] NY2d 869; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Coleman, 225 AD2d 705). In any event, the defendant’s contention is without merit. The People disproved the defendant’s alibi by proving their own case beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v O’Neill, 79 AD2d 429). Pizzuto, J. P., Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Marinus, 254 A.D.2d 372, 678 N.Y.S.2d 532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 372 (People v. Marinus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Delamota
74 A.D.3d 1225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. McCall
277 A.D.2d 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)