People v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Coleman

268 A.D.2d 303, 700 N.Y.S.2d 819, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 459

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 303 (People v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Coleman, 268 A.D.2d 303, 700 N.Y.S.2d 819, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.), rendered August 29, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

After suitable inquiry, the court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea (see, People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536). The record, including defendant’s thorough plea allocution, establishes the voluntariness of the plea, and defendant’s assertion that such voluntariness was impaired by mental illness and medication is unsupported by any evidence. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.), rendered August 29, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

After suitable inquiry, the court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea (see, People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536). The record, including defendant’s thorough plea allocution, establishes the voluntariness of the plea, and defendant’s assertion that such voluntariness was impaired by mental illness and medication is unsupported by any evidence. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 303, 700 N.Y.S.2d 819, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coleman-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack