Pensacola, A. & W. Ry. Co. v. Big Sandy Iron Co.
This text of 41 So. 418 (Pensacola, A. & W. Ry. Co. v. Big Sandy Iron Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It cannot be gainsaid that, “since this court acts on the transcript alon^, the latter must show all the facts essential to vest the court with jurisdiction to hear the cause.” Therefore ’it must affirmatively appear in the transcript that there was a properly organized trial court by which a lawful judgment could be rendered. — McPherson v. Wiggins, (Ala.; April 28, 1906) 40 South. 961; 2 Ency. of Pl. & Pr. p. 265, (3), and authorities in note 2; 2 Cyc. p. 1033 (11), and au[275]*275th.ori.ties in notes 17 and 18. This record fails to show the organization of the trial court, and the appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 So. 418, 147 Ala. 274, 1906 Ala. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pensacola-a-w-ry-co-v-big-sandy-iron-co-ala-1906.