Ogden v. State

68 So. 701, 13 Ala. App. 205, 1915 Ala. App. LEXIS 37
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PELBLAM, P. J.

The transcript in this case does not contain a caption, as required by the rules of court (see rule 26, Supreme Court Rules adopted June 23, 1913, 175 Ala. xix, 61 South, vii); nor does it show that the court trying the case was held at the place designated by law, or that it was convened.or presided over by a judge authorized to hold it. The certificate of appeal certifying to the correctness of the record appears in the transcript in blank without the signature of the attesting officer.

The Attorney General insists in brief that the appeal must be dismissed because of a failure of the record [206] to show that the judgment appealed from was rendered by a court organized pursuant to law. The point is well taken, and the appeal must be dismissed.—Thomas v. Daniel Bros., 42 South. 623; McPherson v. Wiggins, 40 South. 961; Grantham v. State, 3 Ala. App. 168, 57 South. 1025; Pensacola, A. & W. Ry. Co. v. Big Sandy Iron Co., 147 Ala. 274, 41 South. 418; Bowen v. State, 9 Ala. App. 664, 62 South. 994; Gallahar v. Ingram & Co., 9 Ala. App. 432, 62 South. 989; City of Demopolis v. Atkeison, 4 Ala. App. 278, 58 South. 684.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogden v. State, 68 So. 701, 13 Ala. App. 205, 1915 Ala. App. LEXIS 37 (Ala. Ct. App. 1915).

68 So. 701 (Ogden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
13 Ala. App. 684 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)