Cheshire v. State

62 So. 994, 8 Ala. App. 253, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 161
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 1913·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PELHAM, J.

— The defendant is indicted for obtaining an insurance policy by falsely pretending to own certain property. This is the only false pretense alleged, and it is not shown whose signature was thus obtained. This defect in the indictment was pointed out by demurrers that should have been sustained.

Moreover, the indictment, as set out in the record before us, does not state the facts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know with any degree of certainty what is intended to be charged. — Code, § 7134. In fact, it is not (as set out in the record) an intelligible statement of any offense.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cheshire v. State, 62 So. 994, 8 Ala. App. 253, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 161 (Ala. Ct. App. 1913).

62 So. 994 (Cheshire v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Earnest v. State
113 So. 2d 517 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1959)
Gayden v. State
80 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Johnson v. State
76 So. 2d 351 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1954)
Gayden v. State
80 So. 2d 495 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1954)
Ogden v. State
68 So. 701 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Clark v. State
62 So. 987 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)