Clark v. State
62 So. 987, 8 Ala. App. 105, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 133
Opinions
— “The record in this case does not show that the court was held at the place designated by law, or that it was convened or presided over by a judge authorized to hold it. The appeal must be dismissed because of failure of the record to show that the judgment .appealed from was rendered by a court organized pursuant to law.” — Grantham v. State, 3 Ala. App. 168, 57 South. 1025; Thomas v. Daniel, 42 South. 623; McPherson v. Wiggins, 40 South. 961; Sam Bowen v. State, Infra, 62 South. 994; 2 Cyc. 1033.
Appeal (Jismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. State, 62 So. 987, 8 Ala. App. 105, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 133 (Ala. Ct. App. 1913).
62 So. 987 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hodges v. State
221 So. 2d 922 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1969)
Saylor v. State
177 So. 2d 924 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1965)
Rushing v. State
113 So. 2d 527 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1959)
Thorn v. State
98 So. 2d 860 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Lipscomb v. State
68 So. 2d 862 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1953)
Pesnell v. State
13 Ala. App. 676 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Thornhill v. State
13 Ala. App. 688 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Lawrence v. State
13 Ala. App. 684 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)