Clark v. State
This text of 62 So. 987 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
— “The record in this case does not show that the court was held at the place designated by law, or that it was convened or presided over by a judge authorized to hold it. The appeal must be dismissed because of failure of the record to show that the judgment .appealed from was rendered by a court organized pursuant to law.” — Grantham v. State, 3 Ala. App. 168, 57 South. 1025; Thomas v. Daniel, 42 South. 623; McPherson v. Wiggins, 40 South. 961; Sam Bowen v. State, Infra, 62 South. 994; 2 Cyc. 1033.
Appeal (Jismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 So. 987, 8 Ala. App. 105, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-state-alactapp-1913.