Grantham v. State

57 So. 1025, 3 Ala. App. 168, 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 412
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 6, 1912·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

WALKER, P. J.

The record in this case does not' show that the court was held at the place designated by law, or that it was convened or presided over by a judge authorized to hold it. The appeal must be dismissed, because of the failure of the record to show that the judgment appealed from was rendered by a court organized pursuant to law.—Thomas v. Daniel Bros., 42 South. 623; McPherson v. Wiggins, 40 South. 961; 2 Cyc. 1033.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grantham v. State, 57 So. 1025, 3 Ala. App. 168, 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 412 (Ala. Ct. App. 1912).

57 So. 1025 (Grantham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Dearing-Orman Mercantile Co.
81 So. 861 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1919)
Ogden v. State
68 So. 701 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Clark v. State
62 So. 987 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Gallahar v. Ingram & Co.
62 So. 989 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Bowen v. State
9 Ala. App. 664 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Hudgins v. Pickens County
62 So. 995 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Commissioners Court of Coffee County v. Ballard
59 So. 191 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
City of Demopolis v. Atkeison
58 So. 684 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)