Grantham v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Grantham v. State

57 So. 1025, 3 Ala. App. 168, 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 412

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 6, 1912

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 57 So. 1025 (Grantham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grantham v. State, 57 So. 1025, 3 Ala. App. 168, 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 412 (Ala. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

WALKER, P. J.

The record in this case does not' show that the court was held at the place designated by law, or that it was convened or presided over by a judge authorized to hold it. The appeal must be dismissed, because of the failure of the record to show that the judgment appealed from was rendered by a court organized pursuant to law.—Thomas v. Daniel Bros., 42 South. 623; McPherson v. Wiggins, 40 South. 961; 2 Cyc. 1033.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALKER, P. J.

The record in this case does not' show that the court was held at the place designated by law, or that it was convened or presided over by a judge authorized to hold it. The appeal must be dismissed, because of the failure of the record to show that the judgment appealed from was rendered by a court organized pursuant to law.—Thomas v. Daniel Bros., 42 South. 623; McPherson v. Wiggins, 40 South. 961; 2 Cyc. 1033.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 So. 1025, 3 Ala. App. 168, 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grantham-v-state-alactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack