Hudgins v. Pickens County
62 So. 995, 9 Ala. App. 228, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 294
Opinions
There is neither an assignment of errors nor anything that purports to be an assignment of errors on the record, and the judgment of the court beIoav must be affirmed for failure to comply with the rule requiring an assignment of errors on the transcript to present the rulings of the trial court for review. — Civil Code, p. 1506, rule 1.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hudgins v. Pickens County, 62 So. 995, 9 Ala. App. 228, 1913 Ala. App. LEXIS 294 (Ala. Ct. App. 1913).
62 So. 995 (Hudgins v. Pickens County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Dawkins
104 So. 2d 827 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Ex parte Hudgins
65 So. 959 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)
Hudgins v. Pickens County
64 So. 472 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)