Prince v. Hammock

90 So. 2d 672, 265 Ala. 255, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 503
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided September 6, 1956·No. 8 Div. 776·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

GOODWYN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Franklin County, in Equity, overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint.

The appeal must be dismissed because the record fails to show the organization of the court as required by Rule 26 of the Supreme Court Rules, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix (now Rule 24 of Revised Rules of the Supreme Court, 261 Ala. p. XIX et seq.). Such failure is jurisdictional and the court must take notice of it ex mero motu,. West v. Camp, 264 Ala. 644, 89 So.2d 170; Reynolds v. Henson, 264 Ala. 435, 87 So.2d 856; McPherson v. Stallworth, 262 Ala. 367, 368, 78 So.2d 924; Garrard v. State ex rel. Waid, 260 Ala. 486, [256]*256487, 71 So.2d 59; Pensacola, A. & W. R. Co. v. Big Sandy Iron Co., 147 Ala. 274, 41 So. 418.

Appeal dismissed.

SIMPSON, MERRILL and SPANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prince v. Hammock, 90 So. 2d 672, 265 Ala. 255, 1956 Ala. LEXIS 503 (Ala. 1956).

90 So. 2d 672 (Prince v. Hammock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Container Corp. of America
151 So. 2d 773 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Tidwell v. State
130 So. 2d 206 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1961)
Hambrick v. Hambrick
108 So. 2d 165 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1959)
United Security Life Insurance Co. v. White
103 So. 2d 835 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1958)