State v. Container Corp. of America

Supreme Court of Alabama

State v. Container Corp. of America

151 So. 2d 773, 275 Ala. 40, 1963 Ala. LEXIS 549

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 4, 1963

Docket3 Div. 936

StatusPublished

This text of 151 So. 2d 773 (State v. Container Corp. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Container Corp. of America, 151 So. 2d 773, 275 Ala. 40, 1963 Ala. LEXIS 549 (Ala. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

COLEMAN, Justice.

There is no organization of court appearing in the record. This court has held that an appeal must be dismissed where the record fails to show the organization of the court as required by Rule 24 of the Supreme Court. Code of Alabama 1940, Recompiled 1958, Title 7, Appendix; 261 Ala. XXVIII. This matter is jurisdictional and the court must take notice of it ex mero motu. Barnes v. Salter, 270 Ala. 110, 116 So.2d 748; Prince v. Hammock, 265 Ala. 255, 90 So.2d 672; Glenn v. Sutton, 265 Ala. 154, 90 So.2d 227; Powell v. Powell, 265 Ala. 48, 89 So.2d 530; West v. Camp, 264 Ala. 644, 89 So.2d 170; Reynolds v. Henson, 264 Ala. 435, 87 So.2d 856; McPherson v. Stallworth, 262 Ala. 367, 78 So.2d 924; Garrard v. State ex rel. Waid, 260 Ala. 486, 71 So.2d 59; Pensacola, A. & W. R. Co. v. Big Sandy Iron Co., 147 Ala. 274, 41 So. 418.

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COLEMAN, Justice.

There is no organization of court appearing in the record. This court has held that an appeal must be dismissed where the record fails to show the organization of the court as required by Rule 24 of the Supreme Court. Code of Alabama 1940, Recompiled 1958, Title 7, Appendix; 261 Ala. XXVIII. This matter is jurisdictional and the court must take notice of it ex mero motu. Barnes v. Salter, 270 Ala. 110, 116 So.2d 748; Prince v. Hammock, 265 Ala. 255, 90 So.2d 672; Glenn v. Sutton, 265 Ala. 154, 90 So.2d 227; Powell v. Powell, 265 Ala. 48, 89 So.2d 530; West v. Camp, 264 Ala. 644, 89 So.2d 170; Reynolds v. Henson, 264 Ala. 435, 87 So.2d 856; McPherson v. Stallworth, 262 Ala. 367, 78 So.2d 924; Garrard v. State ex rel. Waid, 260 Ala. 486, 71 So.2d 59; Pensacola, A. & W. R. Co. v. Big Sandy Iron Co., 147 Ala. 274, 41 So. 418.

Appeal dismissed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 So. 2d 773, 275 Ala. 40, 1963 Ala. LEXIS 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-container-corp-of-america-ala-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack