Norris v. Thornell

Opinion

2 3 4 5 8 9 Christopher Michael Norris, No. CV-25-08039-PCT-SMB 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 Vv. Ryan Thornell, 13 Respondent. 14 15 United States Magistrate Judge Deborah Fine has issued a report and 16 recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 9) recommending that the Petition be dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file 18 objections to the R&R. (R&R at 24-25) (citing Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) 19 No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. 20 See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3);Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 21 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Nevertheless, 92 the Court has reviewed the pleadings and agrees with the analysis of Magistrate Judge Fine. The Court will accept and adopt the R&R. 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of 25 Magistrate Judge Fine (Docs. 9) is accepted. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this case with prejudice. The Clerk of 27 Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case. 28 Dated this 21st day of July, 2025. SSE