Lee v. Lampert
This text of 653 F.3d 929 (Lee v. Lampert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richard R. LEE, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Robert O. LAMPERT, Respondent-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Stephen R. Sady, FPDORFederal Public Defender's Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellee.
Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, Carolyn Alexander, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Oregon Department of Justice, Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, AGOR&mdashOffice of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Appellant.
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
*1177 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
653 F.3d 929, 2011 WL 3275947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-lampert-ca9-2011.