Lee v. Lampert

653 F.3d 929, 2011 WL 3275947
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 8, 2011·No. 09-35276·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

633 F.3d 1176 (2011)

Richard R. LEE, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Robert O. LAMPERT, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 09-35276.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 8, 2011.

Stephen R. Sady, FPDOR—Federal Public Defender's Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, Carolyn Alexander, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Oregon Department of Justice, Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, AGOR&mdashOffice of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondent-Appellant.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

*1177 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929, 2011 WL 3275947 (9th Cir. 2011).

653 F.3d 929 (Lee v. Lampert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
D. Idaho, 2026
Cedric Taylor v. Sean Moore
C.D. California, 2023
(HC) Earle v. Sherman
E.D. California, 2021
(HC) Panighetti v. Gastelo
E.D. California, 2019