Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co.
106 S.E. 300, 26 Ga. App. 473, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 486
Opinion
The judgment of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case has the effect of granting a new trial; and this being the first grant of a new trial, and the evidence not having demanded the verdict, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court the judgment of the judge of the superior court will not be set aside. See Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43-4 (45 S. E. 722), and cases cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 106 S.E. 300, 26 Ga. App. 473, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 486 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
106 S.E. 300 (Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McWhorter v. Stein
171 S.E. 583 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Smith v. Williamson & Sons Inc.
159 S.E. 912 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Zeigler v. Perry
141 S.E. 426 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Maynard v. American Railway Express Co.
115 S.E. 35 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Darley v. Williams
111 S.E. 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
McCall v. Stubbs
111 S.E. 63 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Murray v. Stribling
110 S.E. 761 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)