Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/McWhorter v. Stein

McWhorter v. Stein

171 S.E. 583, 47 Ga. App. 838, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 688
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1933·No. 23322·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Guerry, J.

The sustaining of a certiorari and granting of a new trial for the first time, where the verdict is not demanded by the evidence, will not be disturbed by this court. Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43 (45 S. E. 722); Gresham v. Lee, 28 Ga. App. 576 (112 S. E. 524); Cox v. [839] Grady, 132 Ga. 368 (64 S. E. 262) ; Smith v. Williamson, 43 Ga. App. 702 (159 S. E. 912) ; Murray v. Stribling, 28 Ga. App. 211 (110 S. E. 761); Nickajack Milling Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 26 Ga. App. 473 (106 S. E. 300).

Decided November 11, 1933. Thomas E. Scott, for plaintiff in error. Bryan, Middlebroolcs & Carter, John A. Bunaway, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McWhorter v. Stein, 171 S.E. 583, 47 Ga. App. 838, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 688 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

171 S.E. 583 (McWhorter v. Stein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burnum v. Thomas
31 S.E.2d 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Peacock v. American Plant Co.
175 S.E. 262 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Hurt v. Stewart
174 S.E. 924 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)