Murray v. Stribling
Opinion
“ The judgment of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case has the effect of granting a new trial; and this being the first grant of a new trial, and the evidence not having demanded the verdict, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court the judgment of the judge of the superior court will not be set aside. See Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43-4 (45 S. E. 722), and cases cited.” Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 26 Ga. App. 473 (106 S. E. 300). See also Bingham v. Haines, 25 Ga. App. 136 (3) (102 S. E. 923), and cases cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
110 S.E. 761 (Murray v. Stribling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.