Murray v. Stribling

110 S.E. 761, 28 Ga. App. 211, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 393
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 14, 1922·No. 12830·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

“ The judgment of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case has the effect of granting a new trial; and this being the first grant of a new trial, and the evidence not having demanded the verdict, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court the judgment of the judge of the superior court will not be set aside. See Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43-4 (45 S. E. 722), and cases cited.” Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 26 Ga. App. 473 (106 S. E. 300). See also Bingham v. Haines, 25 Ga. App. 136 (3) (102 S. E. 923), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. F. A. McWhorter, for plaintiff in error. Homer Legg, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Stribling, 110 S.E. 761, 28 Ga. App. 211, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 393 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

110 S.E. 761 (Murray v. Stribling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McWhorter v. Stein
171 S.E. 583 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Smith v. Williamson & Sons Inc.
159 S.E. 912 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Sunbeam Heating Co. v. Mason
155 S.E. 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Zeigler v. Perry
141 S.E. 426 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Folds v. Harris
129 S.E. 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Daniell & Beutell v. McRee
120 S.E. 448 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)