Darley v. Williams
111 S.E. 83, 28 Ga. App. 323, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 482
Opinion
“ The judgment of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case has the effect of granting a new trial; and this being the first grant of a>new trial, and the evidence not having demanded th'e verdict, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court the judgment of the judge of the superior court will not be set aside. See Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43-4 (45 S. E. 722), and cases cited.” Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 26 Ga. App. 473 (106 S. E. 300).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Darley v. Williams, 111 S.E. 83, 28 Ga. App. 323, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 482 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
111 S.E. 83 (Darley v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sunbeam Heating Co. v. Mason
155 S.E. 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Folds v. Harris
129 S.E. 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Daniell & Beutell v. McRee
120 S.E. 448 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)