Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/McCall v. Stubbs

McCall v. Stubbs

111 S.E. 63, 28 Ga. App. 308, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 470
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1922
Docket12971
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 111 S.E. 63 (McCall v. Stubbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCall v. Stubbs, 111 S.E. 63, 28 Ga. App. 308, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

“ The judgment of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case has the effect of granting a new trial; and this being the first grant of a new trial, and the evidence not having demanded the verdict, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and [309]*309of this court the judgment of the judge of the superior court will not be set aside. See Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43-4 (45 S. E. 722), and cases cited.” Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 26 Ga. App. 473 (106 S. E. 300).

Decided March 7, 1922. Certiorari; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Sheppard. September 16, 1921. A. S. Way, S. B. McCall, for plaintiff in error. Anderson & Hodges, Daniel & Durrence, contra.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sunbeam Heating Co. v. Mason
155 S.E. 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Folds v. Harris
129 S.E. 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Daniell & Beutell v. McRee
120 S.E. 448 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 63, 28 Ga. App. 308, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-stubbs-gactapp-1922.