McCall v. Stubbs

111 S.E. 63, 28 Ga. App. 308, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 470
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 7, 1922·No. 12971·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

“ The judgment of the judge of the superior court sustaining the certiorari in this case has the effect of granting a new trial; and this being the first grant of a new trial, and the evidence not having demanded the verdict, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and [309] of this court the judgment of the judge of the superior court will not be set aside. See Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43-4 (45 S. E. 722), and cases cited.” Nickajack Milling & Grain Co. v. International Vegetable Oil Co., 26 Ga. App. 473 (106 S. E. 300).

Decided March 7, 1922. Certiorari; from Tattnall superior court — Judge Sheppard. September 16, 1921. A. S. Way, S. B. McCall, for plaintiff in error. Anderson & Hodges, Daniel & Durrence, contra.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCall v. Stubbs, 111 S.E. 63, 28 Ga. App. 308, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 63 (McCall v. Stubbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sunbeam Heating Co. v. Mason
155 S.E. 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Folds v. Harris
129 S.E. 664 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Daniell & Beutell v. McRee
120 S.E. 448 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)