Nice v. Valenciano

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 2024·No. SCPW-23-0000711·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 23-APR-2024 09:32 AM Dkt. 47 ODMR

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners,

vs.

THE HONORABLE RANDAL VALENCIANO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza JJ., and Circuit Judge Kawamura, in place of Devens, J., recused)

Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration and

“Motion to Compel,” both filed on April 19, 2024, and the

record, we construe both the motion for reconsideration and

“Motion to Compel” to seek reconsideration of this court’s April

2, 2024 order denying the petition. Petitioners’

reconsideration request is untimely because the request was

filed more than ten days after the filing of this court’s April 2, 2024 order denying the petition. See Hawaiʻi Rules of

Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a) (2000).

It is ordered that the motions are denied.

This case is closed. It is further ordered that the

appellate clerk shall not accept additional filings from

Petitioners in this case.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 23, 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Shirley M. Kawamura

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nice v. Valenciano, (haw 2024).

Nice v. Valenciano (Nice v. Valenciano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.