Nice v. Valenciano
This text of Nice v. Valenciano (Nice v. Valenciano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 02-APR-2024 11:20 AM Dkt. 37 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners,
vs.
THE HONORABLE RANDAL VALENCIANO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kawamura, in place of Devens, J., recused)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus
filed December 5, 2023, and the record, Petitioners have not
demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to relief, nor a
lack of alternative means to obtain the relief sought. An
extraordinary writ is unwarranted. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166
(2023).
It is ordered that the petition is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, April 2, 2024.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Shirley M. Kawamura
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nice v. Valenciano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nice-v-valenciano-haw-2024.