Nice v. Valenciano
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 16-NOV-2023 07:47 AM Dkt. 32 ODMR
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners,
vs.
THE HONORABLE RANDAL VALENCIANO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ., Circuit Judge Viola and Circuit Judge Somerville, assigned by reason of vacancies)
Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration filed
on November 7, 2023, the documents filed by Petitioners after
November 7, 2023, and the record, the motion is untimely because
it was filed more than ten days after the filing of this court’s
October 5, 2023 order denying the petition. See Hawaiʻi Rules of
Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 40(a). Even if timely, this court has not overlooked or
misapprehended points of law or fact. See HRAP Rule 40(b).
It is ordered that the motion is denied.
It is further ordered that the appellate clerk shall not
accept further filings in this proceeding. This proceeding is
closed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 16, 2023.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Matthew J. Viola
/s/ Rowena A. Somerville
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nice v. Valenciano (Nice v. Valenciano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.