Nice v. Valenciano
This text of Nice v. Valenciano (Nice v. Valenciano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 13-MAY-2025 11:04 AM Dkt. 23 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners,
vs.
THE HONORABLE RANDAL G.B. VALENCIANO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge,
and
THE HONORABLE ANNE E. LOPEZ, Attorney General, Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Remigio, in place of Devens, J., recused)
Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus,
filed on April 17, 2025 (Petition), the documents attached and
submitted in support, and the record, Petitioners Cameron Nice
and Martha Nice have failed to establish a “clear and
indisputable right to the relief requested and a lack of other means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or to obtain the
requested action.” See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204, 982
P.2d 334, 338 (1999).
Petitioners have repeatedly sought extraordinary relief
from this court concerning the same underlying case (5CCV-22-
0000027). This court has denied those petitions. See SCPW-23-
0000056 docket 16; SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX docket 14; SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
docket 37; SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX docket 85; SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX docket 40;
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX docket 57.
The petition filed in this proceeding is more of the same.
This time, Petitioners add allegations regarding Judge
Valenciano’s January 22, 2025 order declaring Petitioners
vexatious litigants pursuant to Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes § 634J-7
(2016).
None of the arguments made by Petitioner support the
issuance of the requested writ. The burden was on Petitioners
to establish the extraordinary circumstances to warrant
mandamus. We find that Petitioners failed to carry this burden.
It is ordered that the Petition is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 13, 2025
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Catherine H. Remigio
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nice v. Valenciano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nice-v-valenciano-haw-2025.