Nice v. Valenciano

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided February 21, 2023·No. SCPW-23-0000056·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 21-FEB-2023 09:19 AM Dkt. 20 ODMR

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

CAMERON NICE and MARTHA NICE, Petitioners,

vs.

THE HONORABLE RANDAL VALENCIANO, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the February 16, 2023 motion for

reconsideration and materials appended thereto, filed by

Petitioners Cameron and Martha Nice, pursuant to Rule 40 of the

Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP), and the record in

this matter, this court has not overlooked or misapprehended points of law or fact. See HRAP Rule 40(b). Accordingly, it is

ordered that the motion for reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 21, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nice v. Valenciano, (haw 2023).

Nice v. Valenciano (Nice v. Valenciano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.