Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board
This text of Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteb ~tate~ (!Court of §ppeaI~ for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit
MATTHEW J. NASUTI, Petitioner,
v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
2011-3048
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC1221090356-M-1.
ON MOTION
ORDER
The Department of State moves to recaption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent. Matthew Nasuti opposes.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, NASUTI v. MSPB 2
the Board dismissed Nasuti's appeal for lack of jurisdiction, concluding that the letter he submitted could not be con- sidered new evidence and added to the record. The Board never reached the merits. Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The revised official cap- tion is reflected above.
(2) The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.
FOR THE COURT
MAR 10 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
cc: Matthew J. Nasuti FILED u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR A. Bondurant Eley, Esq. THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Jeffrey A. Gauger, Esq. MAR 102011 s23 JAti HORBAlY C\.EII(
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nasuti-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2011.