Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Opinion

` NOTE; This order is nonprecedentiai. United States Court of Appeais for the Federai Circuit i»'vr"¢r'~r"'w`§r"nFi : :'l;_"`\ §-_5"_" ii !'l_i-§§-!";!"_!"! -_-.- -.= -_ = e. -_-= -.-_-_--_--_-, Petitioner, V. NiER|T SYSTE|V|S PROTECT|ON BOARD, Respondent. ii¢`\i i'\Ei ii ii i1`\i iiii:5 '\."iiii_i`F.5 iii ! Ei3:iUiiiii:5i i`\_Fii:iiii:iLi@iii§iii i_`\_"! i`.\"i_i iEii_ii_"E3:3 iii i'§3ii,iiiii i_iiE i,ii§ii_1ii;ii \_-;1.5_H_!\_1ll ii !`i!3!!-`:i£`ii`!I5_?!3! ?i`!!3! F‘__"i!3!i`ii I"€"_"_C1?£3!i`!`!_C: §-;?`!`!?!3!!`:?i!`!i`! i"i_!`!:3_!`!`i §§ ?i`!!:! ?`£:!!7-:_"!!`!i`!!`i!:!i`!? §-E:?eE5._i `\_." §-ZIF`!5_!".!"_!`! __ _____::______ ____ _______ __,_______ _ __________ ______ ___ ____ _____________ ___.5; __ ______ i=F_L_5_L_5L_iT;CT;- § when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the B0ard. The deciding agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. in this case, the Board dismissed the appeal for iack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent. Accordingiy, |T |S ORDERED Ti-iAT; (1) The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected above