Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
MATTHEW J. NASUTI, Petitioner,
V.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. t
2012-3162
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC1221120321-W-1.
ON MOTION `
ORDER
Matthew J. Nasuti moves to recaption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board_. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when
the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Nasuti’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
MATTHEW NASUTI V. MSPB
Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition
for review. Accordingly, IT ls ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted. The revised official caption is
reflected above.
AUG 24 2012 Date
ccc Matthew J. Nasuti
s Michael D. Austin, Esq.
Calvin Morrow, Esq. s2 1
FoR THE CoURT
/s/ J an Horbaly J an Horbaly
Clerk
LED LS FOR
AUG 24 2012 JAN HORBALY €LERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.