Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 376 F. App'x 29
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 24, 2012·No. 2012-3162·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

MATTHEW J. NASUTI, Petitioner,

V.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. t

2012-3162

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC1221120321-W-1.

ON MOTION `

ORDER

Matthew J. Nasuti moves to recaption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig- nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board_. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when

the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Nasuti’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

MATTHEW NASUTI V. MSPB

Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition

for review. Accordingly, IT ls ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The revised official caption is

reflected above.

AUG 24 2012 Date

ccc Matthew J. Nasuti

s Michael D. Austin, Esq.

Calvin Morrow, Esq. s2 1

FoR THE CoURT

/s/ J an Horbaly J an Horbaly

Clerk

LED LS FOR

AUG 24 2012 JAN HORBALY €LERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Nasuti v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related