Mrs. Gladys Noah v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

265 F.2d 547, 1959 A.M.C. 573, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5121
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 1959
Docket17282
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 265 F.2d 547 (Mrs. Gladys Noah v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mrs. Gladys Noah v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 265 F.2d 547, 1959 A.M.C. 573, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5121 (5th Cir. 1959).

Opinions

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

The question before us is whether a longshoreman injured on navigable waters, or his dependent, may sue under the Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Act, LSA-R.S. of 1950, 23:1021 et seq. The district court held that the federal Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., applied and dismissed the suit. A majority of the Court (Chief Judge Hutcheson and Judge Cameron) is for reversal.

Melvin Noah, a longshoreman, was loading pig iron on a ship docked in the Mississippi River at New Orleans. A barge was moored between the ship and the wharf. Noah fell from the barge and was drowned. There is no doubt that he was acting in the course of his employment or that he was a longshoreman. Noah’s mother, partially dependent on her son for support, brought suit in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans under the state Workmen’s Compensation Act.1 The appellee removed the case to the federal district court.

A majority of this Court is of the opinion that in view of the light Hahn v. Ross Island, 358 U.S. 272, 79 S.Ct. 266, 3 L.Ed.2d 292 casts on Davis v. Department of Labor, 1942, 317 U.S. 249, 63 S.Ct. 225, 87 L.Ed. 246, Noah was a waterfront worker in the twilight zone. The plaintiff therefore may elect to bring suit under the state compensation law or the federal Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. Accordingly, the judgment below is reversed and the case remanded for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Texas Employers Insurance v. Calbeck
249 F. Supp. 217 (E.D. Texas, 1966)
Travelers Insurance Company v. C. D. Calbeck
293 F.2d 52 (Fifth Circuit, 1961)
Travelers Insurance v. Calbeck
293 F.2d 52 (Fifth Circuit, 1961)
Berner v. Oil Transport Co.
126 So. 2d 731 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1961)
T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Frank Williams
275 F.2d 397 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. P. J. Donovan
274 F.2d 794 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Donovan
274 F.2d 794 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Calbeck
230 F. Supp. 9 (S.D. Texas, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 F.2d 547, 1959 A.M.C. 573, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 5121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mrs-gladys-noah-v-liberty-mutual-insurance-company-ca5-1959.