Moore v. State

182 S.E. 823, 52 Ga. App. 210, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 110
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 Ga. App. 218
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 6, 1935·No. 25258·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The accused was convicted of larceny. In the accusation he was charged with stealing, on October 6, 1933, six bushels of corn, “the property of Jim Kenney and of the value of six dollars.” Conceding that the evidence was sufficient to show that the defendant stole the corn, no proof was made of its value, or of the time when it was stolen. It follows that the conviction was unauthorized, and the refusal to grant a new trial was error. May v. State, 111 Ga. 840 (36 S. E. 222); Lane v. State, 113 Ga. 1040 (39 S. E. 463), and cit. The remaining assignments of error are not passed on.

Judgment reversed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 182 S.E. 823, 52 Ga. App. 210, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 110 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

182 S.E. 823 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

May v. State
36 S.E. 222 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Lane v. State
39 S.E. 463 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)