Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Moore v. State

Moore v. State

175 S.E. 401, 49 Ga. App. 341, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 397
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 11, 1934·No. 24107·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

GtUerry, J.

Presence of the defendant at a still in actual operation and producing whisky; his flight upon being discovered thereat, together with evidence that he was “toting wood” and firing the furnace, are amply sufficient to support a conviction of manufacturing liquor.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur. J. A. Mitchell, P. H. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error. J. Cedi Davis, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 175 S.E. 401, 49 Ga. App. 341, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 397 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

175 S.E. 401 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
73 S.E.2d 502 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Moore v. State
1 S.E.2d 219 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)