Moore v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Moore v. State

162 S.E. 847, 44 Ga. App. 759, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 484

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 17, 1932

Docket21886

StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 847 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moore v. State, 162 S.E. 847, 44 Ga. App. 759, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 484 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence is circumstantial, depending entirely upon “recent possession” of the hogs alleged to have been stolen. The defendant stated to the jury that he purchased and paid for the hogs, and substantiated his defense by the testimony of several witnesses. A careful reading of the brief of evidence satisfies this court that the evidence fails to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.

[760]*760Decided February 17, 1932. O’Neal & O’Neal, for plaintiff in error. Robert B. Short, solicitor-general, contra.

Therefore, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is reversed upon the general grounds.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, G. J., concurs. Blood-worth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI