Moore v. State

171 S.E. 834, 48 Ga. App. 98, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 472
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 28, 1933·No. 23625·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where the answer of the trial judge to a petition for certiorari is traversed, and the issue thus made is submitted to the judge of the superior court, his finding thereon can not be reversed by this court if it is authorized by any evidence. Under the facts of the instant case this court can not hold that the finding of the judge of the ' superior court against the traverse was not authorized by the evidence.

2. While the evidence adduced upon the trial in the city court of Buford was in acute conflict, and would have authorized the defendant’s acquittal of the offenses charged, there was some evidence which authorized the verdict, and this court is without authority to interfere with the judgment overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 171 S.E. 834, 48 Ga. App. 98, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

171 S.E. 834 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cannon v. MacOn Fire & Police Pension Board
224 S.E.2d 851 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Boswell v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
192 S.E. 926 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)