Lane v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Lane v. State

39 S.E. 293, 113 Ga. 724, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 366

DecidedJuly 18, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 39 S.E. 293 (Lane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. State, 39 S.E. 293, 113 Ga. 724, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 366 (Ga. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

jPish, J.

The only grounds of the motion for a new trial being that the verdict-was contrary to the law and to the evidence, and the evidence being amply sufficient to sustain the verdict, the judgment of the court refusing a new trial is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Indictment for selling crop under lien. Before Judge Adams. City court of Dublin. May 13, 1901.

Howttrd & Armistead, for plaintiff in error. F. G. Corker, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

jPish, J.

The only grounds of the motion for a new trial being that the verdict-was contrary to the law and to the evidence, and the evidence being amply sufficient to sustain the verdict, the judgment of the court refusing a new trial is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Indictment for selling crop under lien. Before Judge Adams. City court of Dublin. May 13, 1901.

Howttrd & Armistead, for plaintiff in error. F. G. Corker, solicitor, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 S.E. 293, 113 Ga. 724, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-state-ga-1901.