May v. State
36 S.E. 222, 111 Ga. 840, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 799
This text of 36 S.E. 222 (May v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
May v. State, 36 S.E. 222, 111 Ga. 840, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 799 (Ga. 1900).
Opinion
Even if the evidence was sufficient to show that the defendant committed the larceny with which she stood charged, a new trial should nevertheless have been granted, because no proof was made of the value of the article alleged to have been stolen, nor of the time at which the larceny was committed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Studdard v. State
170 S.E.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Moore v. State
182 S.E. 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Ayers v. State
59 S.E. 924 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Lane v. State
39 S.E. 463 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
36 S.E. 222, 111 Ga. 840, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-state-ga-1900.