Home/Supreme Court/Mississippi Central R. v. Smith

Mississippi Central R. v. Smith

299 U.S. 518, 57 S. Ct. 313
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 21, 1936
DocketNo. 543
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 299 U.S. 518 (Mississippi Central R. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mississippi Central R. v. Smith, 299 U.S. 518, 57 S. Ct. 313 (1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dsmissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied. The motion of the appellee to allow damages is granted, and it is ordered that damages of five hundred dollars, payable to the appellee, be taxed against appellants. Mississippi Central R. Co. v. Roberts, 296 U. S. 536; Mississippi Central R. Co. v. Aultman, 296 U. S. 537.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

KOPP v. Fischer
811 F. Supp. 2d 696 (W.D. New York, 2011)
United States v. Private E2 JARROD E. MCCLAIN
65 M.J. 894 (Army Court of Criminal Appeals, 2008)
United States v. Dionisio
503 F.3d 78 (Second Circuit, 2007)
Gooding v. Stotts
856 F. Supp. 1504 (D. Kansas, 1994)
Trailer Exp., Inc. v. Gammill
403 So. 2d 1292 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1981)
United States v. David H. Moore
613 F.2d 1029 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
United States v. J. Milton Rich
589 F.2d 1025 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
Casey v. Texgas Corp.
361 So. 2d 498 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1978)
White v. State
238 S.E.2d 247 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Blondes v. State
330 A.2d 169 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
State ex rel. Fallis v. Vestrem
1974 OK CR 184 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1974)
United States v. Ronald S. Jenkins
490 F.2d 868 (Second Circuit, 1973)
Joseph E. Mullreed v. George A. Kropp, Warden
425 F.2d 1095 (Sixth Circuit, 1970)
State v. Rhodes
413 P.2d 214 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1966)
United States v. Armco Steel Corporation
252 F. Supp. 364 (S.D. California, 1966)
Raymond Earl Foster v. United States
339 F.2d 188 (Tenth Circuit, 1964)
United States v. Dante Edward Gori
282 F.2d 43 (Second Circuit, 1960)
United States v. Wells
9 C.M.A. 509 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1958)
Iva Ikuko Toguri D'Aquino v. United States
192 F.2d 338 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)
Hunter v. Wade
169 F.2d 973 (Tenth Circuit, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 U.S. 518, 57 S. Ct. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mississippi-central-r-v-smith-scotus-1936.