Mississippi Central R. v. Aultman

296 U.S. 537, 56 S. Ct. 108
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1935
DocketNo. 181
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 296 U.S. 537 (Mississippi Central R. v. Aultman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mississippi Central R. v. Aultman, 296 U.S. 537, 56 S. Ct. 108 (1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240, 241. (2) New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 649-651; Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Illinois, 175 U. S. 626, 633; Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197. The motion of the appellees to allow damages is granted, and it is ordered that damages of one hundred dollars, payable to appellees, be taxed against appellants. Slaker v. O’Connor, 278 U. S. 188; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elkins v. Land Title Bank & Trust Co.
302 U.S. 638 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Potter v. Young
302 U.S. 638 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Mississippi Central R. v. Smith
299 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Winston Bros. v. Stover
299 U.S. 508 (Supreme Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 U.S. 537, 56 S. Ct. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mississippi-central-r-v-aultman-scotus-1935.