Mississippi Central R. v. Aultman

296 U.S. 537, 56 S. Ct. 108
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1935·No. No. 181·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240, 241. (2) New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 649-651; Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Illinois, 175 U. S. 626, 633; Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 197. The motion of the appellees to allow damages is granted, and it is ordered that damages of one hundred dollars, payable to appellees, be taxed against appellants. Slaker v. O’Connor, 278 U. S. 188; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mississippi Central R. v. Aultman, 296 U.S. 537, 56 S. Ct. 108 (1935).

296 U.S. 537 (Mississippi Central R. v. Aultman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elkins v. Land Title Bank & Trust Co.
302 U.S. 638 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Potter v. Young
302 U.S. 638 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Mississippi Central R. v. Smith
299 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Winston Bros. v. Stover
299 U.S. 508 (Supreme Court, 1936)