Winston Bros. v. Stover

Supreme Court

Winston Bros. v. Stover

299 U.S. 508, 57 S. Ct. 44

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 12, 1936

DocketNo. 338

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 299 U.S. 508 (Winston Bros. v. Stover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Winston Bros. v. Stover, 299 U.S. 508, 57 S. Ct. 44 (1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed (1) for the want of a substantial federal question (Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207, 223, 224; Heim v. McCall, 239 U. S. 175, 191-193; Caldwell v. Louisiana, 282 U. S. 801; Gianatasio v. Kaplan, 284 U. S. 595); (2) for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 641, 648; Leonard v. Vicksburg R. Co., 198 U. S. 416, 422, 423; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303. The motion of the appellee to allow damages is granted, and it is ordered that damages of one thousand dollars, payable to appellee, be taxed against appellant. Slaker v. O’Connor, 278 U. S. 188; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191; Mississippi Central R. Co. v. Aultman, 296 U. S. 537.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed (1) for the want of a substantial federal question (Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207, 223, 224; Heim v. McCall, 239 U. S. 175, 191-193; Caldwell v. Louisiana, 282 U. S. 801; Gianatasio v. Kaplan, 284 U. S. 595); (2) for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 641, 648; Leonard v. Vicksburg R. Co., 198 U. S. 416, 422, 423; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303. The motion of the appellee to allow damages is granted, and it is ordered that damages of one thousand dollars, payable to appellee, be taxed against appellant. Slaker v. O’Connor, 278 U. S. 188; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191; Mississippi Central R. Co. v. Aultman, 296 U. S. 537.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 U.S. 508, 57 S. Ct. 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/winston-bros-v-stover-scotus-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack