Elkins v. Land Title Bank & Trust Co.

302 U.S. 638, 58 S. Ct. 39
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 11, 1937·No. No. 276; No. 277·Published

Opinion

Appeals from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeals is granted and the appeals are dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question, Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Mississippi Central R. Co. v. Aultman, 296 U. S. 537; and (2) for the reason that the judgments sought herein to be reviewed are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them, Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson City, 141 U. S. 679, 688; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Southern Nebraska Power Co. v. Nebraska, 299 U. S. 520.

Reported below: 325 Pa. 373; 190 Atl. 650.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elkins v. Land Title Bank & Trust Co., 302 U.S. 638, 58 S. Ct. 39 (1937).

302 U.S. 638 (Elkins v. Land Title Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson City
141 U.S. 679 (Supreme Court, 1891)
Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal
251 U.S. 179 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
261 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1923)
McCoy v. Shaw
277 U.S. 302 (Supreme Court, 1928)
Elkins's Estate
190 A. 650 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Mississippi Central R. v. Aultman
296 U.S. 537 (Supreme Court, 1935)