Elkins v. Land Title Bank & Trust Co.
Opinion
Appeals from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeals is granted and the appeals are dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question, Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Mississippi Central R. Co. v. Aultman, 296 U. S. 537; and (2) for the reason that the judgments sought herein to be reviewed are based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support them, Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson City, 141 U. S. 679, 688; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Southern Nebraska Power Co. v. Nebraska, 299 U. S. 520.
Reported below: 325 Pa. 373; 190 Atl. 650.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
302 U.S. 638 (Elkins v. Land Title Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.