Southern Nebraska Power Co. v. Nebraska ex rel. Sorensen

299 U.S. 520, 57 S. Ct. 323
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 18, 1937·No. No. 603·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it, Electric Co. v. Dow, 166 U. S. 489, 492, 493; Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 641, 648; Leonard v. Vicksburg Ry. Co., 198 U. S. 416, 422, 423; Gause v. Detroit Trust Co., 297 U. S. 695, (2) in so far as a federal question is sought to be presented, for the want of a substantial federal question, Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174, 176; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184; Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Texas, 296 U. S. 552.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Southern Nebraska Power Co. v. Nebraska ex rel. Sorensen, 299 U.S. 520, 57 S. Ct. 323 (1937).

299 U.S. 520 (Southern Nebraska Power Co. v. Nebraska ex rel. Sorensen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elkins v. Land Title Bank & Trust Co.
302 U.S. 638 (Supreme Court, 1937)