Mississippi Central R. v. Roberts

Supreme Court

Mississippi Central R. v. Roberts

296 U.S. 536, 56 S. Ct. 107

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 14, 1935

DocketNo. 180

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 296 U.S. 536 (Mississippi Central R. v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mississippi Central R. v. Roberts, 296 U.S. 536, 56 S. Ct. 107 (1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240, 241. (2) New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 649-651; Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Illinois, 175 U. S. 626, 633; Dewey v. Des Moines, [537]*537173 U. S. 193, 197. The motion of the appellees to allow damages is granted, and it is ordered that damages of one hundred dollars, payable to appellees, be taxed against appellants. Slaker v. O’Connor, 278 U. S. 188; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Messrs. Thomas Brady, Jr., and Thomas C. Hannah for appellants. Mr. Lee D. Hall for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; St. Louis & San Francisco R. Co. v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240, 241. (2) New York v. Kleinert, 268 U. S. 646, 649-651; Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Illinois, 175 U. S. 626, 633; Dewey v. Des Moines, [537]*537173 U. S. 193, 197. The motion of the appellees to allow damages is granted, and it is ordered that damages of one hundred dollars, payable to appellees, be taxed against appellants. Slaker v. O’Connor, 278 U. S. 188; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Messrs. Thomas Brady, Jr., and Thomas C. Hannah for appellants. Mr. Lee D. Hall for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 U.S. 536, 56 S. Ct. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mississippi-central-r-v-roberts-scotus-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack