Minton v. Quintal
This text of Minton v. Quintal (Minton v. Quintal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000317 17-APR-2013 SCWC-11-0000317 11:46 AM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
ERIC J. MINTON and RICHARD M. STANLEY, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,
vs.
SIDNEY A. QUINTAL, JOHN C. FUHRMANN, CITY and COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Respondents/Defendants-Apellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000317; CIV. NO. 07-1-2354)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, and Pollack, JJ., Circuit Judge Castagnetti, in place of Acoba, J., recused, and Circuit Judge Kim, in place of McKenna, J., recused)
Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants’ application for writ of certiorari filed on March 4, 2013, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 17, 2013.
Charles S. Lotsof and /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Jack F. Schweigert for petitioners /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti
/s/ Glenn J. Kim
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Minton v. Quintal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minton-v-quintal-haw-2013.