Minton v. Quintal

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Minton v. Quintal. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Haw. 167
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided December 27, 2013·No. scwc-11-0000317·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000317 27-DEC-2013 11:32 AM

SCWC-11-0000317

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ERIC J. MINTON and RICHARD M. STANLEY, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

SIDNEY A. QUINTAL, JOHN C. FUHRMANN, CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000317; CIV. NO. 07-1-2354)

ORDER OF CORRECTION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, and Pollack, JJ., Circuit Judge Castagnetti, in place of Acoba J., recused, and Circuit Judge Kim, in place of McKenna, J., recused)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court,

filed on December 13, 2013, is corrected as follows:

1. On page 9, line 15:

Insert quotation marks around the word “drops” and add

“(sic)” so that as corrected the line reads: a person who moves

the “drops” (sic) in the concert hall.

2. On page 65, line 8:

Delete “§” The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these

changes.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 27, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Jeannette H. Castagnetti

/s/ Glenn J. Kim

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minton v. Quintal, (haw 2013).

Minton v. Quintal (Minton v. Quintal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.