Minton v. Quintal
This text of Minton v. Quintal (Minton v. Quintal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000032 23-JUN-2016 10:07 AM
SCWC-15-0000032
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
ERIC J. MINTON and RICHARD M. STANLEY,
Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants,
vs.
SIDNEY A. QUINTAL, JOHN C. FUHRMANN, and
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU,
Petitioners/Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-15-0000032; CIVIL NO. 07-1-2354)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.,
and Circuit Judge Ochiai in place of McKenna, J., recused)
Petitioners/Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees
Sidney A. Quintal’s application for writ of certiorari filed on
May 16, 2016, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 23, 2016.
Donna Y.L. Leong, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
Matthew S.K. Pyun,
John P. Moran and /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Nicolette Winter
for petitioners /s/ Richard W. Pollack
Charles S. Lotsof /s/ Michael D. Wilson
for respondents
/s/ Dean E. Ochiai
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Minton v. Quintal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minton-v-quintal-haw-2016.