Miller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miller v. State

450 S.W.3d 464, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1091, 2014 WL 4823646

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1512 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2014·No. No. WD 76979·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derick Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, following his conviction on two counts of second degree statutory rape and four counts of second degree statutory sodomy. Miller contends his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to certain testimony by the victim and the victim’s mother. For reasons ex[465]*465plained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derick Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, following his conviction on two counts of second degree statutory rape and four counts of second degree statutory sodomy. Miller contends his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to certain testimony by the victim and the victim’s mother. For reasons ex[465]*465plained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Miller v. State, 450 S.W.3d 464, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1091, 2014 WL 4823646 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

450 S.W.3d 464 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.