Mickey Dilts v. Penske Logistics LLC

because the FAAAA “us[es] text nearly identical to the Airline Deregulation Act’s,” 3 “analysis from . . . Airline Deregulation Act cases is instructive for [the] FAAAA analysis as 4 well”

Cta v. Rob Bonta

Ninth Circuit, 2021

holding that California’s meal-and-rest-break laws “are not preempted even if they raise the overall cost of doing business or require a carrier to re-direct or reroute some equipment”

Allen Miller v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

Ninth Circuit, 2020

“[L]aws mandating motor carriers’ use (or non-use) of particular prices, routes, or services in order to comply with the law are preempted.”

Allen Miller v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

Ninth Circuit, 2020

observing that state laws have “an impermissible effect” when they “interfer[e] at the point that a carrier provides services to its customers”

Allen Miller v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

Ninth Circuit, 2020

describing laws that are preempted under the FAAAA as those that “directly or indirectly mandate, prohibit, or otherwise regulate certain prices, routes, or services” (emphasis added)

Metropcs California, LLC v. Michael Picker

Ninth Circuit, 2020

“find[ing] . . . persuasive” an agency’s 30 METROPCS CALIFORNIA V. PICKER position that a federal statute does not preempt state laws

California Trucking Association v. Becerra

S.D. California, 2020

meal and rest break laws

Air Transport Association of America Inc v. Sacks

W.D. Washington, 2019

holding that 7 California’s meal and rest break laws were not preempted as applied to truckers

Robin Brindle v. Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training, by and through its Director

Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2019

stating that even a statute's potential impact on carrier's prices, routes, and services can be sufficient