McDonald v. State
649 So. 2d 943, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1271, 1995 WL 59554
This text of 649 So. 2d 943 (McDonald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McDonald v. State, 649 So. 2d 943, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1271, 1995 WL 59554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order denying the motion to suppress. However, we strike the special condition of probation prospectively imposing appellate costs. Davis v. State, 641 So.2d 972, 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Anderson v. State, 632 So.2d 132, 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Anderson v. State
632 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Davis v. State
641 So. 2d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
649 So. 2d 943, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1271, 1995 WL 59554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.