Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McDonald v. State

McDonald v. State

649 So. 2d 943, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1271, 1995 WL 59554
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 631 So. 2d 1137 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1995·No. No. 94-0604·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying the motion to suppress. However, we strike the special condition of probation prospectively imposing appellate costs. Davis v. State, 641 So.2d 972, 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Anderson v. State, 632 So.2d 132, 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

GUNTHER, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDonald v. State, 649 So. 2d 943, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1271, 1995 WL 59554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

649 So. 2d 943 (McDonald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. State
632 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Davis v. State
641 So. 2d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)