McDonald v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McDonald v. State

622 So. 2d 1344, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7160, 1993 WL 247165

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 7, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1599

StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 1344 (McDonald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonald v. State, 622 So. 2d 1344, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7160, 1993 WL 247165 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged by information with one count of robbery with a firearm. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. When appellant subsequently appeared before the trial court for sentencing, the trial court entered judgment according to the verdict and sentenced appellant as an habitual offender.

Appellant now argues that the evidence presented below was insufficient to support a guilty verdict on the charge of robbery with a firearm. We disagree and affirm. See Brown v. State, 397 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Flagler v. State, 189 So.2d 212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966).

We also affirm appellant’s sentence as an habitual offender. See Herrington v. State, 622 So.2d 1339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

DELL, C.J., and WARNER'and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI