McDonald v. State
661 So. 2d 417, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10910, 1995 WL 610377
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDonald v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 631 So. 2d 1137 →
Opinion
We conclude that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s rule 3.850 motion without an evidentiary hearing on one ground of the motion only — that alleging ineffective assistance of counsel because of insufficient time to investigate and prepare for a trial. The portions of the record attached to the order denying relief do not conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief, and accordingly we reverse and remand for an eviden-tiary hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McDonald v. State, 661 So. 2d 417, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10910, 1995 WL 610377 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
661 So. 2d 417 (McDonald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.